I've listened as Presidential Debates have asked the questions: What would you about the War in Iraq? What would you do about Health Care? etc. I strongly believe that these are the wrong questions. These questions presuppose that the candidates have an understanding and basic knowledge of our federal government. But, if this premise is not correct, I believe we need to find out sooner rather than after election.

I believe that Presidential Candidates should first be asked questions such as:
1. Have you ever read the U. S. Constitution? And, if so, what are 3 points that you recall?
2. Based on the U. S. Constitution, what are the three branches of the government?
What are their functions?
Does each branch have limited powers?
Describe the concept of "checks and balances".
Do you believe that there should be oversight within in the Executive Branch? Describe the purpose of 'oversight' within the executive branch.
3. Have you read the Bill of Rights? And, if so, what importance do you place on each right?
4. Do you agree with the separation of Church and State?
5. What is the Geneva Convention about? Is it important to comply with international law?
6. Under what authority may the U. S. go to war?
7. Should the U. S. Government be subject to the 'rule of law"?

I would love to hear this type of interview with Presidential Candidates and it might help educated those voters who have not yet had the opportunity to consider these questions.

But, if this type of open debate is not 'news worthy', then maybe we should require presidential candidates to take a written test regarding their knowledge, skills, and abilities related to the U. S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and related issues. If they pass, then move on to the questions about what would they do to end the war…..etc.